This is the second time this week someone has told me that I should install Flash so that I can view their website. Why on earth would you deliberately design a website that can’t be viewed (at all) without a third party plug in?
I quote:
Recent Posts
Archives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Tags
asa
authorization
brm
cc
censorship
cns
compliance
copyright
dbd
developers
dis 29500
disposition
drm
eeepc
enforceability
ethics
Eula
flash
floss
gov
government
ideology
iso
law
life
monopoly
odf
ooo
oooannoyances
ooxml
open access
open source
osp
p2p
patent
patents
pfft!
piracy
policy
procurement
python
software
standards
suxz
youtube
Blog Stats
- 104,251 hits
OSWALD Newsletter
If you would like to receive OSWALD, a weekly open source news digest please send an email to oswald (with the subject "subscribe") at opensourcelaw.biz
0 Responses to “Flash Marketing -1”